Copywriter Edge
  • Home
  • Copywriter’s Blog
  • About
    • Copywriter Portfolio
    • Books
    • Markets
    • Copy Brief
  • Copywriter’s News
  • Copywriter Services
    • Web Copy Assessment (FREE)
    • Sales Funnel Copywriter
    • Sales Script Copywriter
    • White Paper Copywriter
    • Press Release Copywriter
    • Newsletter Copywriter
    • Web Copywriter
    • Brochure Copywriter
    • Case Study Copywriter
    • Blog Copywriter
    • Video Script Copywriter
    • Proofreading / Editing
  • FAQ
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Resources
  • Home
  • Copywriter’s Blog
  • About
    • Copywriter Portfolio
    • Books
    • Markets
    • Copy Brief
  • Copywriter’s News
  • Copywriter Services
    • Web Copy Assessment (FREE)
    • Sales Funnel Copywriter
    • Sales Script Copywriter
    • White Paper Copywriter
    • Press Release Copywriter
    • Newsletter Copywriter
    • Web Copywriter
    • Brochure Copywriter
    • Case Study Copywriter
    • Blog Copywriter
    • Video Script Copywriter
    • Proofreading / Editing
  • FAQ
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Resources

Copywriter's Blog

Dismantling the ‘infinite monkey’​ theorem

18/9/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
In my quest for philosophically induced breakdowns of cherished beliefs, motivated perhaps by the sheer challenge of confronting my own biases, I sought to identify cornerstones of ideological waves of thought, and then attempt to unleash the force of unsettling chaotic skepticism upon them. Because, beyond overdramatic flamboyant writing styles (such as my own), nothing does a greater disservice to a position than a bad argument. One such thought experiment was my skeptical analysis of the ‘infinite monkey’ theorem.

The ‘infinite monkey’ theorem asserts the hypothetical notion that a monkey typing randomly and unintelligibly for eternity could end up producing, to the exact detail, all the works of Shakespeare, given enough time (meaning, infinite time). This thought experiment is a basic argument for Darwinian evolution, as it supports the plausibility of randomly created complexity and order without purpose.

Even though the ‘infinite monkey’ theorem is widely accepted as logically sound, I will boldly (perhaps foolishly, who knows?) attempt to question its validity.

Let us re-examine the ‘infinite monkey’ theorem. It is the idea that infinite randomness will end up with infinite possibilities. I respectfully disagree, and here’s why: this theorem is based on the assumption that a monkey’s keystrokes are ‘sufficiently randomized’, and this rule is not random.

I don’t question Darwinian evolution here, but rather, I am simply skeptical (and cynical) of this theorem’s value as a valid argument for Darwinian evolution. The ‘infinite monkey’ theorem is a bad analogy because random monkeys do not type perfectly randomly. They type in the quite limiting manner which their clumsy thick fingers allow them. Therefore, given infinite time, we’d get infinite letter combinations of adjacent keys, and perhaps zero combinations of letters whose keys are of a certain distance apart on the keyboard (or old-fashioned typewriter — I miss those…). To perform otherwise would mean that we’re not dealing with a monkey but with a computer program that is ‘programmed’ to produce ‘sufficiently randomized’ letter combinations to ensure the creation of any and all sequences possible. However, this requires the setting of a rule, which in itself is not random. Infinite time does not guarantee infinite possible results. An easy way to see this is by picturing the infinite points on a ruler between 0 and 1. There are infinite possibilities of points on that line, but none of those infinite points will ever be point 1.01. Infinity, it seems, is finite.

To assume perfect randomization is to assume a purpose, which makes the ‘infinite monkey’ theorem self-defeating. Therefore, to end up with infinite random possibilities in infinite time, we require a rule, which in itself is not a random thing. This realization, like most of philosophy, serves to further confuse us in our search for the truth. But it makes the journey towards truth while sailing on the boat of philosophy much more interesting! :)

Article originally posted on Medium.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    June 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019

    Categories

    All
    Advice
    Copywriting
    Economics
    Emotional Intelligence
    Employment
    Evolution
    Fitness
    Leadership
    Logical Thinking
    Markets
    Motivation
    Perspective
    Philosophy
    Politics
    Real Estate
    Reason
    Storytelling
    Technology
    Travel

    RSS Feed

How's your copy? Let me help.

Copywriter Services
Copywriter Resources
Copy Brief
Frequently Asked Questions
Pricing
Blog
News
Portfolio
About
Contact
Privacy Policy
Contact me

    I occasionally send out exclusive useful information on copywriting and content marketing. Subscribe to my newsletter!
    I promise not to flood your inbox...

Subscribe to my Newsletter
© 2020 Copywriter Edge. All Rights Reserved.